Post New Topic  
Edit Profile | Register | Search | FAQ | Forum Home
    next newest topic
»  The War Diary   » General Discussions   » Current Affairs   » Meanwhile, in Britain ...

UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: Meanwhile, in Britain ...
Current Affairs Forum Moderator
Member # 107

Member Rated:

posted 01 May 2021 14:28     Profile for bossi   Email bossi     Send New Private Message     Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
(from the Telegraph)

Leaked papers highlight danger of Forces cuts
By Michael Smith, Defence Correspondent

SWEEPING cuts in Army numbers and equipment expected within weeks of the election will have a "highly damaging impact" on Britain's defences, say leaked Ministry of Defence documents.
They will put soldiers' lives at much greater risk, the papers say.

The cuts of at least �1.2 billion have been forced by the Treasury because of the rising cost of the Royal Navy's two new aircraft carriers and their aircraft, defence sources said. At present that bill stands at �8 billion.

The documents contradict claims last week by John Spellar, the Armed Forces minister, that there had been no discussion or even "theoretical paperwork" at the MoD about Army cuts.

Mr Spellar was responding to a report in The Daily Telegraph that up to 10 of the Army's front-line units were to be axed, with not even the Household Cavalry and the Guards regiments safe.

Iain Duncan Smith, the shadow defence secretary, said: "It is clear that they have accepted plans to make vicious and deep cuts to our Armed Forces. We cannot believe their denials."

The documents discuss extensive cuts to armoured regiments and the cancellation of a number of "high priority" equipment contracts.

Defence sources said yesterday that there were also plans to reduce the Territorial Army by 15,000 soldiers and wipe out many historic regimental names for ever.

The cuts follow the end of 12 years of Army control over the forces. Adml Sir Michael Boyce, the new Chief of Defence Staff, is a fervent advocate of the aircraft carriers. He told The Daily Telegraph last week that they were "essential" and at the heart of defence policy.

The Army has been told to find the cuts but not to put anything in writing to ministers until after the election because of Labour's pledge that there would be no cuts on top of those in the 1998 strategic defence review.

"Ministers want to keep it as deniable as possible, so no final decision will be taken until after the election," a senior Army officer said. If Labour returned to power, the plans would go to ministers within weeks, he added.

The cuts will then be sold as the result of a reduction in tension in Northern Ireland and an inevitable result of the inability of the Army to push its numbers up to the target figure of 108,000.

One of the leaked documents, entitled Short Term Plan (STP)/Equipment Plan (EP) 2001 says: "We propose to reduce the cost of the planned equipment programme by some �1.2 billion over the four-year period 2001/2 to 2004/5.

"Inevitably, the deferrals, reductions in planned numbers and in some cases cancellations needed to effect this will have a highly damaging impact on our previously planned improvements to capability."

It concludes by saying that the recommended programme "makes only limited progress towards the rectification of some important capability gaps.

"In some cases, where the threat from potential enemies is increasing, this could result in future operations carrying a higher level of risk than current ones."

The ministry claims that such studies are made all the time. But the document, marked Confidential UK Eyes Only, makes clear that the Army has no choice but to implement radical cuts.

It says: "In view of our circumstances, we have considered whether a more radical examination of the force structure would offer savings."

The document, written in February, states that while "no force structure is immutable, it would be premature and potentially counter-productive to make changes at this stage".

But within weeks the Army Board had been forced to think the unthinkable and cut the number of front-line units to match the levels of manpower it could hope to meet, defence sources said.

This would mean axeing up to 10 armoured and infantry battalions. As most front-line regiments have only a single regular battalion, 10 regiments could go.

A second document, dated April 4, 2001, speaks of the need to shed two tank battalions, a quarter of the tank force, and suggests cutting a complete battle group from each of the four armoured brigades.

The document, entitled Armour/Anti-Armour Study, Force Structure Implications, says that this would leave the fighting forces "structurally flawed". The Army would have "some difficulty" in taking part in even "medium scale war fighting operations", it concludes.

Menzies Campbell, the Liberal Democrats' defence spokesman, said: "There is more than a hint of a retreat to the salami slicing approach of the last Government, which caused considerable damage to morale and to capability. The truth is that if we want good defence we have to pay for it."

Posts: 222 | From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada | Registered: Jun 2000  |  IP: Logged
Veteran Member
Member # 172

Member Rated:

posted 02 May 2021 13:56     Profile for fortuncookie5084     Send New Private Message     Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
That sucks. Maybe the MOD should stop paying for breast implants if their financial house is really in such disarray.
Posts: 61 | From: Montreal | Registered: Feb 2001  |  IP: Logged
Current Affairs Forum Moderator
Member # 107

Member Rated:

posted 09 May 2021 10:37     Profile for bossi   Email bossi     Send New Private Message     Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Meanwhile, in New Zealand ...

Scrapping of air force combat jets stuns many in New Zealand
By Ray Lilley, Associated Press, 5/9/2021 05:01

WELLINGTON, New Zealand (AP) Combat pilots, devastated by New Zealand's decision to eliminate its air defense, warned Wednesday they would look for work overseas.

Defense cuts announced Tuesday will eliminate all jet fighters from the air force, leaving it with just six aging maritime patrol aircraft and some unarmed transport planes.

Wing Commander Nick Osborne, who commands 75 Squadron, the main fighter group, said his troops had no desire to fly unarmed transport planes. He said many were considering seeking work elsewhere.

''There is a real art to becoming a combat pilot. It's not something I want to give up,'' Osborne said. ''There is a lot of anger at the government. Many feel the decision hasn't been thought through, but we're not politicians.''

The navy also is being cut back to two frigates and a clutch of fishery protection vessels. Prime Minister Helen Clark insists the cuts are not a risk because New Zealand faces no serious security threat.

The cuts come at a time when other nations in the region are boosting their armed forces, amid rising tension between China and Taiwan and instability in Indonesia and the South Pacific. Analysts predicted New Zealand would be left internationally isolated and vulnerable.

''This independent policy envisages us relying more on other peoples' contributions of money and lives,'' said Gerald Hensley, a former senior defense official.

It also means New Zealand will no longer play a meaningful role in the Five Power Defense Arrangement, Hensley said, which links it with Australia, Singapore, Malaysia and Great Britain.

The air force cuts will eliminate about 700 jobs, ending a tradition stretching back to World War I and World War II, when New Zealand pilots earned a reputation for skill and bravery.

''The government yesterday destroyed No. 75 Squadron something Hitler's (anti-aircraft) flak and fighters couldn't do,'' the New Zealand Press Association said.

Posts: 222 | From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada | Registered: Jun 2000  |  IP: Logged

All times are ET  

Post New Topic   Close Topic    Move Topic      next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | | Privacy Statement

� 2001 All Rights Reserved.

Powered by Infopop Corporation
Ultimate Bulletin BoardTM 6.1.0-beta1