Author
|
Topic: OICW-Objective Individual Combat Weapon
|
|
The Beast
unregistered
|
posted 20 July 2021 21:20
I believe that you will find that during the field trials in Aberdeen that the complexity of the 20mm interface is causing more problems than anticipated by the original designers (H&K; being the primary systems coordinator).While the concept of a mobile 'grendier' operator is not new (a la M203) the idea of having everyone on the squad/section/platoon to have the option is excellent. The problems of the logistical battle load are complex as well. For every 6 round 20mm magazine you will carry, you lose the equivalent weight of 3 x 30 round 5.56mm magazines. Given that the standard battle load for most american infanteers is 6 mags 5.56 loaded and 120 rds on clips stored, this is a massive reduction in close combat capability for the option of 20mm HE (blast radius is less that 1.5 meters fatal to 5 meters fragmentation). Ever use the M40 'golf ball' grenades? It's less effective than that. Just my .02 cents worth Dileas Gu Brath
|
|
|
The Beast
unregistered
|
posted 21 July 2021 00:02
In the view of every operational commander the single most important ability for the situation on the ground is C3...Command, Control and Communications. If the technology can be effective in the dirtiest, vilest conditions that a combat are can produce, then the victor is the the superior C3. If, as Mr. Murphy like to point out to all of us on a regular basis, things go for shit on the tech side, the superior skills of a true warrior will prevail. Too many times in the recent past our technology has tried to overcome the enemy in the field and been defeated by no tech/low tech and the hearts of warriors.Place your faith in the tools of war but be prepared, trained and motivated to close with and destroy the enemy with maximum force and aggression. Anything less and you will be defeated. Dileas Gu Brath
|
|
|