Black6
Soldier
Member # 674
|
posted 06. February 2002 13:32
|
|
I know simulations have their place in training. Just look at the US Armor Center's SIMNET. A modern TEWT - tactical exercise without tanks
Some off the shelf sims are doing a damn fine job - I plan to introduce Steel Beasts to my unit. )I hate the name - but don't judge a book/sim by it's cover!
http://www.esimgames.com/steelBeasts.htm
One could successfully argue that any 'game' which reinforces the principles of war (maintaining the aim, surprise, concentration of force, etc) or tactical principles (fire and movt, mutual support, depth, maintaining a reserve, etc) would be contibuting to professional development. When one includes an after action analysis of the 'game', lessons could be learned and reinforced. Mistakes should be examined and overcome. Playing games without review is almost wasted time.
The game of chess, the game of kings, has been around for thousands of years. The original wargame. |
"Keep your hands off the Regiment, ye iconoclastic civilian officials who meddle and muddle in Army matters" Wolseley |
Member Rated:
|
Posts: 31 | From: Canada | Registered: Feb 2002 |
|
|
|